Monday, March 27, 2006

Why No One Does Anything About it and who is involve

THE STORY THAT WE NEED TO KNOW ABOUT
REAL ESTATE FRAUD IN AMERICA

HIDDEN COVEYANCE
ILLEGAL TRANSFERS OF DEEDS
MISSING PIN NUMBERS ON SOLD PROPERTY
THEFT OF PROPERTY OWNED BY THE ELDERY WITHIN
ADMINSTRATIVE DEEDS

AND MORE

A LICENSE TO STEAL



Listen to the Audios of stories
from others



Please Listen to the last hour

Sat., March 25, 2006: Playlists: M3U | RAM (Individual MP3s: Hr1 Hr2 )
1st Hour Guest: Dr. Nick Begich discussing mind control (www.EarthPulse.com)

http://truthradio.com/AudioArchive/Burley,%20D'Anne/07281-AR%20D'Anne%20Burley%2003-27%2016-0.MP3


2nd Hour Guest: Jack discussing his nightmare experiences with his mortgage


THE NEW WAVE OF THEFT
ABUSED TO THE ELDERLY

MY STORY

THE ONE THEY CAN KILL YOU FOR
AND REFUSE TO INVESTIGAGE
BECAUSE OF TIES
TO ELECTED OFFICALS

In the Beginning

Circuit Court of Cook County Case

1995

The First One in Chicago was
4617 North Magnolia
Chicago Illinois

I won the law suit but the property was clouted
within the system and the person involved in the scam
was allowed to flee the city without paying
one dime!

She used the Address of the Law Firm of Kirkland and Eliss
200 Easy Randolph Street in Chicago Illinois

She was a women who seemed to not want to hurt a fly but again when all was said and done they attempted to her me this women and the man who was in charge of the condo association who was also a member of the Council of Foreign Relations, there was also that fact that there was someone who worked from within Cook County Title and Trust.

Did this person use these ties to control the courts and was a Cook County Judge involved in obstructing justice by not looking into this matter which was bought before him on the basic of real estate fraud.

My life and that of my children to high levels of lead and other hazzards all being allowed by those within City, State and Federal Government!


The game was to make it look like there where problems which had been addressed years before as stated within the lawsuits that had spanned over 5 years prior to my renting.

The reason - to keep taking security deposits, and rent and kicking the persons out and or making it hard for them to stay in a property which made Pacific Heights look like Disney land!

Because she was employed there
when I contacted the Law firm

they did nothing to stop her why?

I moved into Pacific Heights the movie but it was the urban Chicago version featuring my family and me as the stars. It was a racial issue that at the time I felt was not the issue but as I look back it was due to the fact that the owner and those who were a part of the condo association did not want me a black female in their building and upon moving into this location I was a victim of Housing Genocides and no one in Chicago’s so-called political arena would do anything within the structure of alleged government offices which are in place to investigate the acts of housing fraud, racism and deceptive practices. I reported and reported and nothing happened until I had leveled a law suit against those involved via a friend of my, a real city activist who placed me with a attorney who knew what to do.

Prior to this I was the victim on the first day of moving into this building of someone being within my apartment claiming to be on a construction team, who told me that they were reconstructing the unit I just gave $3,000 to move into.

This unknown worked who saw me move my first box into my unit told me he would have me out the next day! From that time on the story of Pacific Heights began, they started hammers, drilling, sawing up to 3am and I called the police who did nothing. The landlord of the condo would not return my money nor would she make available another unit instead, the scam was to defraud me of my $3,000 in cash, and then start pouring dirt, bricks and concrete from the third floor into the ceiling of my unit and then to cause bricks to fall into the inside of my apartment from the unit being reconstructed above. All just to run me out, because I had located court records and those folks doing this before, using the excuse of the removal of load bearing walls out of my unit. The fact was the this issue had been repaired many times before, and this property was a property that was one of the building involved within probate court which was being used to scam insurance companies of millions by a continuous pattern of repairs for the same reason. Those involved got big money, so did those within the courts was assisted in this process.

The victim of course so it being touted gets there deposit and rent stolen in this scam and those in housing court and within the city turned there head not to let anyone interfere in this process. I stayed there because I refused to become another victim, but was taken to court because I refused to turn over rent to those who were involved in the attempt of murder of my family. I had three children, who were all under the age of 17 and the youngest was just 8 years old who were being the victim of lead exposure, and other dangerous material found within the walls of older housing. But the Chicago, State and Federal EPA told me that it was not within their job to investigate this nor could anyone else do anything about it the so called Human Rights Commission and all the other agencies these croaks where allowed to do a job on us out in the open. And once in court Judge Lester Foremen was the one who was the first Judge to handle this case, which was prior to this before Judge Garber, who headed up housing court, all were ok with landlord fraud, and all ruling that it was ok to kill people within homes in housing Genocides.

Judge Lester Foremen, transferred the case and it may have been because I had recalled him being one of the Judges involved in “Greylord” via the law firm I worked for in the area of Conflict of Interest, whereby my firm got in trouble for giving things to judges ( well this was alleged and found correct whereby many judges it Illinois ended up in prison!) Just because I had gone and investigated why Foreman was still allowed his judgeship may have been the reason why he removed himself from this case. But I indeed remembered the whose’s who list because I was within a law firm back then which had over 250 attorneys one of the top ones in the world then and saw much and had many details!

In the case of Judge Garber, I found that his wife held on to property in her name to keep away from this Judge the issue that their maybe conflict from the issue of bias based on him being a landlord and maybe was more moved to rule in the direction of the landlords and not the tenants. But it seems within some of the County courts these conflict and bias are ok, and again it’s ok to operate Expartee i.e one sided due to connection clout and other drops made to some.

The outrage was that I got no help from no one other than the Attorney by activist friend in regards to stopping this outrageous action. Because of being in court and having my home attacked daily all hours of the night by those within the condo association who also worked in the County Attorney Title And Trust Dept., and also being on the board /membership of the Council for Foreign Relations, it was a scandal after a scandal. But the list of renters who came in and got taken in the same fashion was again outrageous. But it was corruption the daily environment it seems that many within the city of Chicago strive on. I was the victim all right, and then there was the woman who rented the unit to me the owner who worked for the Law Firm of Kirkland and Ellis, and who used there offices located at 200 East Randolph as her home address, When I had attempted to have her served by the Sheriff out of Cook County for the law suits I had filed, they would not take the summons so I drafted a service summons and service it on the law firm my self because the sheriff claimed that they could do nothing. This case was in court for almost two years I won but the court allowed this woman to flee without giving me one cent! She moved and worked under Ken Starr of the fame involving President Clinton but as I tracked her she ended up another state, the head of the condo association was heavily clouted and used it all the attack me and my children in court and also had those persons constructing target my unit in fact one day they when over the edge in there attempt to get me whereby they did damage which fall behind the wall into the unit of the condo associate manager.

But even after begin exposed to dangerous dirt, bricks and other material Judge Garber evicted me without any regard to the fact I was the victim of Housing Genocide. Whereby he and others who are still on the bench and protected no one questions and again no one recalled in the city of Chicago Greylord. So I won but I loss in health, my children were effected and saw both racism, hatred and Genocides which they understood is a way of life in Chicago.

Bring the Story to today; it is still the same old same old. The folks are still moving property in and out of probate turning over properties to friends and family to run into either insurance and or property rental scams while those who are the power to do something turn their heads the other way.

And here in another case within the neighbor Englewood, right by the Englewood library there is the same type of thing happening. A building of over 50 units being taken over by those who are involved in terrorizing the tenants left by turning off utilities like water, gas, cable telephone lines and the last two tenants are left in a very bad Genocide housing condition whereby those in the City of Chicago refuse to do anything to help and or investigate the fact that the landlords are doing constructive eviction which is illegal under the cities housing acts. Again all these so called law are on the books and are never enforced whereby tenants are victims in more ways than one., There are also using all over the place in the cases the issue of placing and exposing tenants to dangerous lead conditions and other things hidden in the walls by not repairing and or doing things with the intent to get rid of prior tenants anyway they can included housing Genocides by using clout connections and dangerous materials found within the walls of older building within the city. Just think of being without water for about a week, having your gas cut off in the winter, then the landlord leaving the building so that strangers can entered in and occupy vacate units, and or you can not drink the water in fear of who knows what being within it. And or not being able to flush your toilet and again this is happening all over the place to many, and lots just happen to be African Americans, Spanish and or poor who have no voice and no one giving them Voice. Then you say just move, but if you have a limited income, and not enough to make a one or two month additional deposit because of credit and or you not being employed because of health issues it is a nightmare but funny to those doing this because the game because a tool to create terrorism within those in Urban communities, the same applies to those within the Suburbs and the complains of blacks go unheard and if you go to court the rules are almost always expartee and or one sided and against those of color.

I am writing this because you may be next, and I was the victim of this many times in Cook and also within Dupage County and those who are sitting in the seats of political offices that should be investigating these things do little or nothing to investigate these things because it seem that it’ s business as usually within good ol’ Illinois.

I will be submitting pictures of these Genocide Housing Units and if you have a story like this one please share it with us here.




AND THE REAL FACTS ABOUT WHOSE INVOLVED
IN OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE REFUSES TO PROSECUTE


HINSDALE ILLINOIS
FRAUD NUMBER 3

THE RENTAL TRAP

GET THEM IN TO COLLECT
THE RENT
GET THEM OUT TO DRAIN THE LOT!




He got the property back after it was in foreclosure How? Making hardly no payments on the mortgage and getting over 5 properties all with cash out on a purchase this is the way of the corruption

While people within Dupage County Government and those within Policing Agencies and others turn there heads once brought into the Judical System of
Dupage County then the case was not reviewed nor heard on the evidence of
Criminal Fraud against me and the court but allowed because those who sat
in review maybe involved in a case much of horrific than


Greylord of 1970's
in Chicago!




DuPage County, Illinois March 27, 2006


Nightmare in Hinsdale Illinois Part 3


933 South Quincy Street, Hinsdale Illinois

Here is the Lawsuit which explains much of the fraud which Dupage County Officals allowed and refused to investigate, the fraud is still going on within the current sale but again this is a election year and they will do nothing about this but again Can and will harassing me and my family on the roadways, blocked employment and have someone attempt to murder me because this is the way of the GOP ties into real estate and property theft!


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA State of Illinois
IN THE CIRCUIT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT




Georgia Makropolus, )
)
Plaintiff )
) Case No. 03LM3172
- vs. )
)
D’Anne Burley )
)
Defendant )
)
Forcible Entry and Detainer )
)
Response )


The Defendant, D’Anne Burley states as her Response, to the Forcible Entry and Detainer Petition in her true hand the following in response to the Forcible Entry and Detainer petition filed:

That the Plaintiff a.k.a Georgia Makropolous, (Georgiann Markopolous, or Georgia Hamilton) placed a “House for Rent” ad in a local newspaper in which I responded to around the middle part or last part of February 2003. The various of names appear on various documents, and information provided from the office of Deeds in Dupage County concerning other property and cases in which the Plaintiff was involved.

The Defendant D’Anne Burley leased said house from her (The Plaintiff) by paying her a sum of $1400.00 plus a pro-rated first months rent. The terms stated within the lease was for two year occupancy. Within the agreement the stated “LESSOR” within definition ( Owner of Property who rents to another party) agreed to repairs to property and to fix a then current issue relating to missing doors on all the closets and basement and also commit to provide lawn care which never happened. The Plaintiff also stated “She” would provide repairs as needed.

The Defendant D’Anne Burley, after just a few months in the permission stated receiving very high water and sewer bills. The Sewer billing going back as far as 3 years, prior to her moving to the property. The Defendant alleges that she was never informed of a prior billing issue relating to others using water and sewer, and called the Plaintiff who claimed she would pay the bill.

All utilities where placed in the name of the Defendant D’Anne Burley, at the time or shortly thereafter once the property was occupied by her and her children.

Within the first month the Defendant also wished to state for the record that Ms. Makropolous, had a “Plumber come to the property” within the first month to fix a water heater, whereas after this repair was done the Defendants water bills skyrocketed to $400-700 every two months. Whereas the Plaintiff stated that she would have someone fix it or check into it. She felt the issue was relating to just toilets leaking from unknown places and then sent in her friend another man who was not a plumber but came in and did some work left and the problem continued.

The Lessee/Defendant needed to have this problem fixed because if effected her ability to have working appliances but also her issue with outrageous billing in her name.

After having many promises made by the Lessor about the repairs the Lessee checked and found out that the LESSOR was not the owner of the property just within the last three months causing her to not pay the rent to the Lessor because the Defendant felt upon checking that the Lessor was combining Consumer Fraud and Deceptive by ever disclosing that she was not a owner but possibility a sublease tenant.

The Defendant D’Anne Burley, confronted Ms. Makropolus about this and was informed of a alleged agreement to purchase said property from the owner, without then releasing that person(s) name even upon verbal request from the Defendant.

The Defendant alleged again were too many questions within the alleged statements that the Plaintiff made to her on her legal right to rent the property. Therefore the Defendant began to investigate on her own who the owner of said property was at the signing of the lease agreement.
Thus finding various names that the Plaintiff has, other than Makropolous, and that the Defendant also alleges that the Plaintiff stated to her that she had nothing at all in writing from the owner as a lease or any other documentation giving her the right to rent the property.

And by granting the Plaintiff there claim, this can therefore allow others to enter into Fradulation Rental Agreement with non-disclosure of true ownership, therefore allowing anyone to take possession of someone’s property and go into illegal rental transactions within all parties being informed of rights and full disclosure prior to contract. That the Defendant contents that the Plaintiff knowing committed this transaction in the attempt to security Deposits and money, from unknowing tenants rendering them without remedy and due process to uncontrollable debt cause by problems with utilities, forcing them to move.

The Defendant alleges that the prior Tenant complaint of problems with plumber prior to moving out and that the unit have a higher than average Tenant Traffic, The Defendant was told that there was a number of people in and out of the under during a period of over the last three years. And the Defendant received this information from others in the area who knew about the property. All stating that Ms. Makropolous was not the owner nor every lived within the unit. One of the tenants had problems reportedly with water as well prior to moving out.

The Defendant states that this was why it a issue to do repairs because she had no right to do so on her own as a non-owner. The Plaintiff stated to the Defendant on many occasions within the past month that she “HAD NO LEASE” nor any documents giving her the right to act as a agent or a owner of record. Thus giving her no rights to contract with another.

The Defendant’s current water bills are $1609.00 in total from the time she entered the property and until now in addition another one is coming out for a two month period for another $700.00 due to this condition. In addition without having doors on the basement her heating bills are high as well. Each time that the Defendant spoke to the Plaintiff she was told different stories. And then later told that she had already made over 20-30 thousand dollars in repairs in the property and that the owner would not fix anything. Then she “The Defendant” was told at this time there was another person owning the house. Upon the Defendant conducting her own investigation found out that this man was not the person found within the records of the recorder of deeds either.

The Defendant felt that fraud was being committed because after she spoke to neighbors who informed her that Ms. Makropolous was not the owner nor she never lived at the property.

The Defendant attempted to reached the owner of record but there is not phone number for him at his address within the record of the recorder of deeds.

The Defendant also stated that the Plaintiff told her a J&D Management called her about my rent, a woman by the name of Joanne called the Defendant asking for the rent stating she was the agent for the owner. But this too the Defendant alleges was another lie, and due to this the Defendant called a government agency to investigate what was going on, upon calling the agent stated that J&D Management (Joanne) was not working for the owner but a sister of Ms. Makropolous and that they had no information on who the owner was again denoting again intent to defraud.

The Defendant was also aware that the “Owner of the property” was the one who had the responsible to make repairs and that she “The Lessee” could not do so without being held liable for any damage cause upon making repairs on the unit which cause the Defendant to withhold rent. For the following reasons:

The Theory of Defense

1) Because the Lessor as stated within this case to be The Plaintiff Georgia Makropolous and that there was no mention of her non ownership to said property, nor any statements or claims of a sublease to the Defendant by she hand for unknown owners, there is a question to her right to rent said property to Ms. Burley, the question of the validation of lease is in question. Georgia Makropolous, was not the owner of record as seen within the attached record and exhibited evidence (Exhibit __) from the Office of the Recorder of Deeds, nor did she ever produce a contract showing she was given the right to lease the property via the owner of record, under the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act., 815ILCS 505/1 to 505/12(The Act), and 505/10(a), The Defendant alleges that the Plaintiff willfully entered a fraudulent Contract using Deception, and Fraud, to gain deposit and rent from the Defendant. The fraud and breach occurred upon signature as the LESSOR, (known as the property owner, not Agent). And upon entering into this contract the Defendant was made promises of providing doors and fixing the water which never fully happened. These things could not be provided by the Plaintiff because she had no authorization and or ownership rights and claims to do so for the Defendant, leaving the Defendant without the full enjoyment of her said unit and causing her harm by water bills of over $700 per each two month period without any recourse for repair, and also unpaid bills from over 3 years prior on the sewer to which the Defendant has now in her name, to add to this injury by the hand of her attorney without a Verification of Certification under oath, signed by Ms, Makropolous included within the court filed case as a third party the attorney with knowledge allow the Plaintiff to render a 10 day notice, as the Agent for unknown owners, which was not stated within the originally lease nor every provided to the tenant Ms, Burley without her investigating after she alleged caught the Plaintiff in many lies.

Upon searching for the true owner the Defendant found out that the true deed states the owner to be Mahlon Miller, thus making the contract a “Fraud” and was created in “Deception” on the part of The Plaintiff. Under Illinois law 815 ILCS Sec. 505/1 to 505/12, Ms. Makropolous with knowledge entered into a two year contract which was not within her right to do without the following;

1) As a sublease she needed a written permission statement signed by the owner given her this right never once produced, nor provided because her stated she never had.
2) Disclosures of all known and unknown owners at the time of leasing, so to make said contact with merit and worth.
3) and working utilities, with doors in closets and basement which was not her intent either.

The Plaintiff never once informed The Defendant of all issues, thus again using false pretense, false promise, misrepresentation of facts, suppression and omission of important facts in the conduct of the Lease Contract given to Ms. Burley, the Defendant, Scarsdale Builders, Inc. V. Ryland Group Inc., 911 f. Supp.337,338(N.D.Ill.1996).

815 ILCS under Section 505/10(a) of the act, it provides private action for damages, and includes as follows:

Any person who suffers actual damages as a result of a violation of this Act committed by any other person may bring an action against such person. The court, in its discretion, may award actual damages, or any other relief which the court deems proper.

The Defendant claims that this case and matter should have never come to court because the Plaintiff’s claim is invalid, for the theory is that she had no right to rent therefore she had no right to file claims for rent, due to the Breach of Contract, issues of Fraud and Deception was conducted at the time of signing a 2 year lease, making the Plaintiff, liable, In Illinois Supreme Court, in Martin v. Heinold Commodities Inc. 163 ILL 2d.33,643 N.E.2d 734,735 (1994) it was held that to recover under the Act one must exhibit:

1) A deceptive act or practice;
2) An intent on the Defendant’s part that the Plaintiff rely on deception and
3) That the deception occurred in the course involving trade and commerce.

Entering into a lease Agreement is indeed a trade, and Ms. Burley, was deceived
and if indeed she was involved with the unknown owners not reported at the time of execution of lease, they too should be held in “contempt” as part of the deception by of the Plaintiff and should be held liable as a class 3 felon under State of Illinois code.

And within this suit they are seeking in addition money damages for Utilities which are in the name of the Tenant/ Defendant.

2) That the Plaintiff within this lawsuit maybe violating consumer and contract laws by the virtual of withholding facts about her rights to lease due to non-ownership and non-disclosure of these facts at the time of rental. The Defendant therefore feels that the contract was Breach due to fraud and Deceptive Practices whereby the Plaintiff withheld this information on ownership with the intent to defraud the Defendant,

3) That the Defendant states that Plaintiff has no rights to filing this case because of whether the Plaintiff had a right to “Lease” and sign a lease as the Lessor and not a Sub-Lessor is in question.
Whether the Plaintiff was committing acts or Fraud and Deceptive Practice because of non disclosures at the time of lease of the true owner of the property as stated within the deed in case of repair, damages and problems arising from said conditions.

4) and that just one month ago the Plaintiff stated that she had no written contract with the owner as a renter or someone leasing with a Option to purchase, or anything giving her rights that the lease is not a binding therefore the question if she has legal rights to receive rents as a non owner without written permission to do so which was not provided to the Defendant at the time of contract voids any rights she has in court to this action being filed.

In argument the Defendant states that this case should be dismissed for the following;

Because of Defects in the Plaintiff’s right to claim and money damage, because of lack of ownership and deception used to do so, because of this the Defendant alleges that this pleading should be stricken and Dismissed. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-615 (from ch. 110, par 2-615)(b)
and that her claim is unenforceable under the provisions of the statute of Fraud. 735 ILCS 5/2-619 (7) The Defendant also herein alleges that under 735 ILCS 5/9-202 ch. 110, par 9-202 Sec 9-202 again the law states that the landlord is the Rightful Owner of the property which the Plaintiff clearly is not.

5) In addition as stated before the Plaintiff is seeking repayment of Utilities which are all in the Defendants name, including the sewer bills for others going three years back before the Defendant entered into the contract. On many occasion the Plaintiff informed the Defendant she would place the billing in her name which was never done leaving the Defendant with a plumbing problem without consent to fix by the true owner and also over $2600.00 in water and sewage in the Defendants name. That The Plaintiff, stated on numerous occasions to the Defendant and others that she was the owner, and indeed the owner of record within the deed for the property located at 933 South Quincy Street, Hinsdale, Illinois 60521.
Conclusion
Therefore the Defendant alleges that the Plaintiff willfully Breach of Contract, and alleged Fraud and deception within said contract has not rights in this cause of action nor to money damages because she is not the owner of the property nor did she give the Defendant the right and knowledge that she was allegedly subletting the house to her on a verbal agreement if indeed this is true from the owner of record.

The Defendant also offers up as evidence in this claim that the Plaintiff, filed by the hands and advance of her attorney a Lease stating she is the LESSOR and then, upon service she is stating that she is now a AGENT for the owner within the pleading filed.

If indeed The Plaintiff is the Agent then the name of the owner should appear on the lease provided and she should have listed herself on the original lease as the Agent not the Lessor again denoting a Breached Contract and Fraud with the purpose of deceive the Defendant.

And because of this the Defendant has attached a motion for a “Rule to Show Cause” because the attorney on the behalf of the Plaintiff knowingly violated Rule 1.2 (d) and (f-(2) ), g, h,i, under the Scope of Representation within the Rules of Illinois Supreme Court and Rules of Professional Conduct.

The Defendant Alleges the Rules were broken by the Attorney upon filing said pleading for the following reasons:

a) The lease states and implied that Ms. Makopolous a.ka, Georgia Hamilton, is the “Owner” and has Ownership rights to file a claim for rent, and utilities (which are in the name of the Defendant.
whereby The Defendant states that within the pleadings the same Plaintiff is also listed as the Agent for unknown owners not stated within the law suit. This implies that she is the owner of record and had the right to lease, maintain and receive rent for a property she owns. But on the other hand is the Agent either stating she is collecting rents for a owner unknown to the Defendant at the time of leasing the property.

In additional to her Defends to the claims herein , the Defendant also states that within the Chicago Lease Agreement she signed with Ms. Makropolous, the terms under No. 7 concerning subletting and leasing states:
Assignment and Subletting: Without the prior written consent of LESSOR, lessee shall not assign this lease, sublet, or grant any concession or license to use the premises or any part thereof..... again covered within 735 ILCS 5/9-202 ch. 110, par 9-202 Sec 9-202 again the law states that the landlord is the Rightful Owner
The Defendant, states that within even the lease, given to her, under # 7, the Lessor/Plaintiff, must have written consent from the owner of record to sublet, and that the Defendant was not informed at the point of signing that anyone other than the Plaintiff existed again placing the Defendant as risk, and also making it impossible to get repairs done, and the question of the rights Plaintiff in this cause is questionable.

The Defendant alleges that because this was within the pleadings filed and that it was also the purpose of her attorney to advance her of her rights by this action being filed it again the Defendant alleges violated the rules and bought forth under Rule 4.1 (a) & (b) with in the Codes of Conduct Supreme Court Rules and “Truthfulness in Statement to Others, fail to disclose a material fact to a third person which the lawyer knows or reasonably should know is false....

The Defendant was told by the attorney of the Plaintiff, that he was going to seek his fees and the Utilities in this suit, and this is stated within the cause for cost and damages, but again the utilities are billed to the Defendant which are the gas, water, sewer, lawn care, garbage, and everything else, nothing is in the name of the Plaintiff so why and how can they seek money damages for something that the Plaintiff has no entitlement as both not being on the bill or being the owner of the property. In addition the cause of Defendant withholding the rent was due to non repairs of the water problem which the Plaintiff never fixed.
RULE 2.1 Advisor, giving advise in filing and or under Rule 3.1 whereby making Meritorious Claims and Contentions of bring forth a frivolous lawsuit, the Defendant in the Forcible Entry and Detainer states and alleges that all claims within the suit where without basis based on the status of the Plaintiff in the case and that the Defendant within this matter has cause and filed a pleading in a counter lawsuit stating that the Plaintiff Georgia Makropolous, a.k.a. Georgia Hamilton, and "others" were involved in a fraud in the original Lease Contract, thus Breach of Contract, and by means of entering into such to commit Fraud and Deception to receive money in a illegal conveyance. The Defendant is the Forcible Entry and Detainer stated the following is true and correct. In addition under Rule 1.2 of the RULES section (d) The Scope of Representation “A Lawyer shall not counsel a client to engage, or assist a client in conduct that the Lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent, and under
Rule 2.1 (f) (1-2) Stating:that a file a suit, assert a position, .....take action to cause maliciously injury to another, and under (2) advance a claim that is unwarranted under existing laws...

Therefore the Defendant prays that this honorable court, grant her the motion on The Rule to Show Cause, and time to file and counter motion against the Plaintiff for Breach of Contract, relating to Fraud and Deceptive Practices. And the this court would render this case dismissed on the grounds that the Plaintiff on not having the right to lease, nor the right to sublet without prior written permission from the owner violated willfully and with intent to defraud, the rights of the Defendant to having use, rights, and working utilities for two years which was stated within the originally agreement.

Signed Respectfully

___________________________
date __________




Name:_______________________________
Dupage Attorney No:_______________Prose
Attorney for:__________________________
Address:_____________________________
City/State/Zip:________________________
Telephone:___________________________











The newest level of Property theft in Illinois History


Document NumberDate RecordedParty NameParty TypeDocument TypeLegal Description
R1996043112 03/15/1996LYONS, ANNE EGRNTORDEEDNA LS 79 & 80 B 30 KEENEY & CO RESUB 38-11
R1996043113 03/15/1996LYONS, ANNE EGRNTORDEEDNA LS 79 & 80 B 30 KEENEY & CO RESUB 38-11
R2004050259 02/24/2004HINSDALE SANITARY DISTMISC 1SEWER LIENLS 81 & 82 WARREN & KEENEY CO SUB 38-11
R2002156629 06/17/2002ANDERSON, RICHARDCLMANTMCLLS 79 & 80 B 30 KEENEY & CO RESUB 38-11
R2002274430 10/16/2002ANDERSON, RICHARDCLMANTMCL RELR2002-156629 NO LEGAL GIVEN
R2004082045 04/01/2004MILLER, MAHLON RMISC 1P ALS 79-80 B 30 KENNEY & CO SUB 38-11
R2004082046 04/01/2004MILLER, MAHLON RGRNTORDEEDLS 79-80 B 30 KENNEY & CO SUB 38-11
R2004082047 04/01/2004SCHIPIOUR, ANTHONYMRTGORMORTGLS 79-80 B 30 KENNEY & CO SUB 38-11
R2005023833 02/02/2005JPMORGAN CHASE BKPLNTIFLPLS 79-80 B 30 WARREN KEENEY & CO SUB 38-11
R2005204768 09/15/2005OLYMPUS M COPLNTIFLPLS 79-80 & PT ADJ VAC ALLEY KEENEY & CO SUB 38-11
1 2


Document NumberDate RecordedParty NameParty TypeDocument TypeLegal Description
R2006053771 03/23/2006SCHIPIOUR, ANTHONYGRNTORDEEDLS 79-80 & PT ADJ VAC ALLEY B 30 WARREN KEENEY & CO SUB 38-11
R2006053772 03/23/2006LEWELLYAN, DAVIDMISC 1P ALS 79-80 & PT VAC ALLEY B 30 WARREN KENNEY & CO SUB 38-11
R2006053773 03/23/2006LEWELLYAN, DAVIDMRTGORMORTGLS 79-80 & PT VAC ALLEY B 30 WARREN KENNEY & CO SUB 38-11
Document NumberDate RecordedParty NameParty TypeDocument TypeLegal Description
R2006053771 03/23/2006SCHIPIOUR, ANTHONYGRNTORDEEDLS 79-80 & PT ADJ VAC ALLEY B 30 WARREN KEENEY & CO SUB 38-11
R2006053772 03/23/2006LEWELLYAN, DAVIDMISC 1P ALS 79-80 & PT VAC ALLEY B 30 WARREN KENNEY & CO SUB 38-11
R2006053773 03/23/2006LEWELLYAN, DAVIDMRTGORMORTGLS 79-80 & PT VAC ALLEY B 30 WARREN KENNEY & CO SUB 38-11



Then I recalled receiving a notice after this property was way past the recovery period in foreclosure that Mr. Anthony Schipour who as far as I had knowledge using a alias name loss this property but below it seems that he was still able to sell it to another person as showned below:

In March of 2006 this property which was before Judge Bonnie Wheaton and transfered into the hands of the bank somehow got back into the hands of Schipour who during the alleged hearing did not pay anything into his mortgage! A first time home loan whereby he walked out with cash of over $100k David Lewellyan.

Here is the right example right here of the illegal transfers this just happened to the home I lived in which was located at 933 South Quincy Street in Hinsdale Illinois.

And the deal goes as follows:

One the property was never owned by the person who rented the home to me it was all done of a fraud, the man Mahlon Miller was in alleged Sheridan Illinois and this property was being handled by his son Miller who took over many propertys in the Dupage county area.

ZThe women who rented the property to me was never on any deed its shown within the county records which are listed above. There is no record of a
Georgia Makropolous, (Georgiann Markopolous, or Georgia Hamilton) and she never had any documents stating she was a Agent for the owner and or anything else she had no right to rent this property out to me!

But in Dupage County this is made legal because the county itsself is involved in a corruption of transfering deeds that are knowingly held by the elderly and then moving these properties in adminstrative deed transfers to who and or whom every they deem will turn around to contributed into their campaigns.

In this cast I had included here the texted of my filed lawsuits which I reclused the Judges in Dupage because they were all involved in the conspiracy but knowingly allowing Motions, and transactions within their courts by people who were involved in a criminal act against me and also the court system itself with no investigation by the States Attorneys Office Joe Bickett, the Judges of Dupage related to this matter, who have brothers working also within the States Attorney's Office which is a major conflict of interest without anyone investigating this. Indeed this matter what taken into the office of the Attorney Generals Office Lisa Madigan who too has done nothing to investigate this fraud because the ties of this property scam goes into the machines campaign funds and right back into the GOP which helps to fund the campaign of President George W. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and others.

Here is a little background on the woman who rented the house to me and was allowed legal venue within Dupage County Courts within them blinking a eye. This case was also argued in Federal Court with the matter going into the Illinois U.S> Justice Department with no review and or question of the argument of Fraud, RICCO , Conspiracy and criminal activities. All within covered this matter up. Including the media. And because I am the media they are attacking me and my family as we speak with attempts on my life!

Here is the background on the woman who rented this home to me:


Georgia Makropolous a.k.a Georgia Markropolous or Alexandria a.k.a Georgia Hamilton, a.k.a Georgia Llaguno

current address: 428 Philadelphia, Westmont, Illinois
Owner of record as stated by the recorder of deeds William Miller

My OLD ADDRESS AND THE HOUSE SHE RENTED TO ME
933 South Quincy Street, Hinsdale Illinois
09-11-426-010

She Got a Illegal Mortgage From by using the name of her alleged Husband

Olympus Mortgage Company
600 City Placeway West
Suite 800
Orange Ca. 92868 Ph 714-634-3404
MB.0006983 New Institution Olympus Mortgage Company of Delaware
600 City Parkway West, Suite 800 Orange, CA 92868 Richard Vaughn - Licensee in Illinois but he is working with Ameriquest Mortgage as a Para Legal using Ameriquest number as the number for Olympus (714) 541-9960 08/06/2003 08/06/2003 08/05/2004 Originating Percent

Olympus Mortgage Company Ph not listed with ORBE But given to me by Richard Vaughn is 714-558-3829 located in Ca.
With a Mortgage Representative working out of his home in Illinois by the name of Miguel Silva - 312-420-7179, no branch office which was being operated out of a Beauty Salon in Hinsdale. and the other branch was in a Doctors Office in Chicago on Clark Street all were not illegal because according to the guildlines of the office of banks and real estate a Mortgage Office has be located within a sole building office separate from any other business.

The ties to Olypus Mortgage Company reach right back into Ameriquest Mortgage Company out of Orange Ca. all being done without any investigation by those within the County Government.

Which I shared this information with ORBE they did nothing stating that they are involved in investigating these matters and that people are getting killed. The office of the Attorney General Lisa Madigan does nothing because of the issue of clout and other ties right back into county politics!

I could have because I had not police protection nothing because I had reported this and filed numerous complaints in fact if I call the police they will do nothing to investigate anything I give them why?

Social Security # 327-50-8278
Home Ph: 630-920-8958 - unlisted disconnected
Cell 630-699-2755 - unlisted told not to use changed number but was connected to her job with the Hospital in Hinsdale Illinois she had alleged

Former address 121 Lakeland, Palos Hills Illinois (Fake)
(False Address not located in either Palos Hills and or Hts Illinois
but Georgiann used this on a mortgage Application)

alleged Property Owner but unseen and or reachable
Pin # 09-11-426-010
Mahlon R. Miller
4324 South 2175 Rd.
Sheridan Illinois 60551

Purchase for $143,000 - Year 1996
There is a Trust Number with #692
with his daughter named as owner

No name of a Bill Miller mentioned

Alleged Miller’s Son but was also I think the same man involved in the same type of Fraud with a man name Bryan Brattalia who did the same fraud in Naperville Illinois.
William Miller’s
1221 Maumell
Hinsdale, Illinois 60521

Alleged Management Company rented the house to Georgiann before I moved in Later stated to the Secret Service that they were just helping out Georgiann and they were related to her)

J & D Management 708-361-8340 Unlisted Disconnected
708-609-8758 Unlisted Disconnected

The woman who is the manager for J & D Management, stated she was the sister just yesterday on Oct 20th of Georgia, and knew nothing of who the owner of the house at 933 South Quincy was she also stated that she just called D’Anne Burley as I flavor to her sister to get D’Anne to pay back rent.

Georgia’s place of employment

Downers Delight Pancake House
630-241-9671 listed 401 75th Street Downers Grove, Illinois
630-241-9674 - listed to G.M. Llagumo, address 7401 Winwood Way, Downers Grove, Il 60516
(this address is not listed in any assessor records nor is it a know parcel in Dupage county but it does have a phone telephone tied to it but it seems tied to the Downers Delight Pancake House.


Chicago Title and Trust - # 901-29-38
171 North Street, Chicago, Illinois
(But people answer as Downers Delight Pancake House)
401 75th Street Downers Grove, Illinois
Downers Grove Illinois
La Grange Hospital 708-352-1200 Ext 4440

Former Employer

Hinsdale Hospital Ph 708-252-1200
(Stated she was a temp


Maybe the same women

Alexandria Markropolous
29 South Park Street
Westmont Illinois
Phone 630-435-0159


OTHER NAMES TIED TO HER AND THE EATER IN WESTMONT
Llaguno, Vilma
Chicago, IL 60607
Details & Map | Check E-mail Search 773-589-9686

Llaguno, Diana
2320 N Nordica Ave
Chicago, IL 60707-2826
Details & Map | Check E-mail Search 773-889-2909




Llaguno, G M
7401 Winwood Way
Downers Grove, IL 60516-4042
Details & Map | Check E-mail Search 630-241-9674

Llaguno, Fernando
534 N Martha St
Lombard, IL 60148-1720
Details & Map | Check E-mail Search 630-620-0534

Llaguno, Guillermo
380 Oak Ave
Wood Dale, IL 60191-1537
Details & Map | Check E-mail Search 630-595-9447



All tied back into Mortgage. Real Estate and Rental Property fraud and all reported without anyone within these agencies interested in it because the results turns into dollars for them!

If you have a case like this one please contact me right away because this is a Nationwide issue.

They sent someone to kill me medically whereby it would have seemed to be a heart attack and or another medical related problem.

Please contact the U.S. Justice Department and flood them with inquiry's to why they are allowing the theft of properties to fund government officials who transfer this into GOP funds all illegal and criminal within Dupage and other Counties of Illinois.

LOOK AT THIS ONE IN GEORGIA AND THERE IS MORE AND MORE OF THIS ALL OVER THE US WHICH IS NOT BEING INVESTIGATED


Link: Text Version Graphic
Graphic: Atlanta Skyline with DOJ Seal
Home About Us Divisions Press Community Employment graphic Citizen Resources Victim-Witness Contact Us Search
Graphic
DOJ seal

INDICTMENT HANDED DOWN IN $20 MILLION MORTGAGE FRAUD

May 13, 2004



U. S. Attorney's Office
Northern District of Georgia
75 Spring Street, S.W. - Suite 600
Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Tel: 404.581.6000
Fax: 404.581.6181
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


William S. Duffey, Jr., United States Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia; William G. Creel, Special Agent in Charge of the Southeast Region, Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Office of Inspector General; and Gregory Jones, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation, announce the unsealing of an indictment returned by a federal grand jury against CHALANA C. MCFARLAND, 35, of Ft. Lauderdale, Florida; BRENDA G. BROWN, 45, of Lithonia, Georgia; LISA R. BELLAMY, 33, of Decatur, Georgia; JUDITH H. "JUDY" HOOPER, a/k/a "Jerry Dale Hunter," 55, currently a fugitive and last known to be living in Belize; MELVIN HOWARD QUILLEN, 35, of Jonesboro, Georgia; THOMAS CHRISTOPHER DAVIS, SR., 35, of Atlanta; BRANDON G. WILHITE, 29, formerly of Jonesboro, Georgia, now living in San Elizario, Texas; JAMES FREDERICK PETTIGREW, 57, of College Park, Georgia; KENNETH "KENNY" EARL COLLINS, 45, of Riverdale, Georgia; OMAR RASHAD TURRAL, 25, of Lauderhill, Florida; MELINDA RENEE TYNER, a/k/a "Little Renee," 33, of Lawrenceville, Georgia; JEWEL WILLIAMS, 38, of Atlanta, Georgia; and SIDNEY WILLIAMS, 39, of Atlanta, Georgia, on charges of wire fraud, bank fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy to commit the offenses of wire, mail and bank fraud, money laundering, identity theft, use of false social security numbers, making false statements to HUD in the Section 8 Housing Assistance Program, all related to a multi-million dollar mortgage fraud scheme. MCFARLAND, BROWN, BELLAMY, TYNER, JEWEL WILLIAMS and SIDNEY WILLIAMS are also charged with obstruction of justice regarding the destruction of mortgage closing and loan files and the false reporting thereof, and MCFARLAND alone is charged with perjury in her testimony regarding her mortgage closings when she was sued by a lender in the United District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. According to Duffey:

The indictment charges that from mid-1999 through March, 2004, MCFARLAND, BROWN, BELLAMY, HOOPER, QUILLEN, DAVIS, WILHITE, PETTIGREW, COLLINS, TYNER, JEWEL WILLIAMS and SIDNEY WILLIAMS defrauded financial institutions and other mortgage lenders by submitting false qualifying information and false documentation to obtain mortgage loans, using the U.S. Mail and various wire transfers of qualifying information and scheme proceeds. The indictment alleges that the DEFENDANTS conspired to either use stolen identities and false Social Security numbers or paid straw borrowers to obtain mortgage loans with false employment, income, assets and liabilities in the applications for numerous mortgage loans totaling approximately $20 million.
According to the indictment:

CHALANA C. MCFARLAND owned and operated The McFarland Law Firm located first at 4820 Redan Road, Stone Mountain, Georgia, and later at 900 North Hairston Road, Stone Mountain, Georgia. She acted as agent for title insurance companies, and was the closing attorney for various lenders. MCFARLAND caused HUD-1 Settlement Statements (HUD-1s) to be signed certifying that she received and disbursed loan proceeds as reflected on the HUD-1s when she closed mortgage loans for various lenders on the properties for which she wrote title insurance, with the actual McFarland receipts and disbursements not as reflected on the Settlement Statements. The indictment alleges that McFarland paid the identity thief $10,000 per identity, the primary appraiser who inflated property values over $400,000, and other coconspirators from her escrow account without reflecting such payments on the settlement statements.

BRENDA G. BROWN and LISA R. BELLAMY were paralegals employed by MCFARLAND at The McFarland Law Firm. JUDITH H. "JUDY" HOOPER was a former mortgage broker who changed her identity to Jerry Dale Hunter and arranged for loans to be originated through the mortgage brokerage firm, "American Mortgage Exchange," before she left the United States in the summer of 2000. HOOPER is also charged in a separate indictment with causing false statements to be made to the Social Security Administration to obtain a Social Security number in the identity of a then two-year-old male child and using that fraudulently obtained SSN to open a Citizens Trust Bank account to received proceeds of the mortgage fraud scheme. MELINDA RENEE TYNER, a/k/a "Little Renee," and other co-conspirators originated and processed fraudulent mortgage loans for American Mortgage Exchange. MELVIN HOWARD QUILLEN was a "borrower," recruited other borrowers and provided shell companies names to use as employers to qualify borrowers for mortgage loans.

OMAR RASHAD TURRAL sold student names, social security numbers and identities obtained from the Pharmacy School of Florida A & M University for use as borrowers on mortgage loans. BRANDON G. WILHITE, JAMES FREDERICK PETTIGREW and KENNETH "KENNY" EARL COLLINS appraised a number of the properties for the loans originated by American Mortgage Exchange and/or closed by MCFARLAND with inflated property values in exchange for money and/or control of certain properties. It is further alleged in the indictment that WHILHITE forged the name of another appraiser on a number of his inflated appraisals. JEWEL WILLIAMS and THOMAS CHRISTOPHER DAVIS, SR., were real estate agents on a number of the fraudulent loans originated by American Mortgage Exchange and/or closed by MCFARLAND. Defendant JEWEL WILLIAMS was assisted by her husband, defendant SIDNEY WILLIAMS who is charged with suggesting the removal and destruction of mortgage closing and loan files and other records then under subpoena and participating in the same.

The indictment charges that the DEFENDANTS, along with others made purchases of residential properties primarily in the Mountain Oaks, North Shore, Southland and Waters Edge Subdivisions located in Lithonia and Stone Mountain, Georgia, and other residential properties in the Douglasville, Elberton, Fairburn, Griffin and Atlanta, Georgia, area for resale at artificially inflated prices, often using the proceeds of the resale to pay for the initial purchase, a practice commonly referred to as "flipping." The defendants would recruit, pay or otherwise induce co-conspirators, commonly referred to as "straw sellers," or locate identities to use as "straw sellers," to falsely claim current ownership of the properties which were sold to straw borrowers at amounts fraudulently inflated by as much as $100,000. Thereafter, the property just sold would be purchased at a much less amount, with the artificially inflated loan amount being shared by coconspirators through disbursements to themselves and their shell companies. The DEFENDANTS would recruit, pay or induce other co-conspirators, commonly referred to as "straw borrowers," to sign and submit documents containing false qualifying information to banks and mortgage companies to obtain mortgage loans. They would also use the stolen identity of other people as straw sellers and straw borrowers for the purpose of fraudulently obtaining mortgage loan proceeds, falsely represent that required down payment amounts were paid from borrower funds and that the property would be the primary residence of the straw borrowers.

As part of the scheme, the indictment charges that the defendants also would use shell, "air" or other companies of the defendants and their co-conspirators and friends to falsify straw borrower employment and to receive scheme proceeds, and pay and otherwise reward bank employees for providing false and misleading Verifications of Deposit. The defendants and their coconspirators would sign ghost or fake names as loan officers and processors of American Mortgage Exchange, the mortgage brokerage firm originating most of these fraudulent loans, and witness, notarize and submit to the lenders purported signatures of straw sellers and straw borrowers who neither attended closings nor signed the closing documents.

At a news conference announcing the indictment along with HUD and FBI, United States Attorney Bill Duffey said, "The mortgage fraud alleged here significantly affected the rights and property of a variety of victims in real estate transactions. That a lawyer and law firm personnel are charged with being at the center of this fraud is particularly disturbing. We look to lawyers to protect the integrity of commercial transactions not violate their duties to clients and the public as the law firm personnel did here."

HUD Inspector General Kenneth M. Donahue stated: "This joint prosecutorial effort by the United States Attorney's Office, the HUD Office of Inspector General, and the FBI, has helped send a strong message that those who seek to unlawfully profit by defrauding programs within the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development will be vigorously investigated and prosecuted."

FBI Special Agent In Charge Gregory Jones said of the case: ""This case shows what we can accomplish when law enforcement agencies pool their resources and talent to work together. Through the efforts of investigators from both the FBI and HUD's Office of the Inspector General, a well-organized and well-concealed criminal enterprise has been dismantled. I want to personally thank SAC Creel and his people for their partnership,
and I look forward to working with them on matters such as this in the future."

One of the defendants, JUDITH HOOPER, whose photo was shown at this afternoon's news conference, remains a fugitive. Anyone with information on her whereabouts is asked to call their local office of the FBI. JUDITH HOOPER was named in a separate indictment unsealed today, charging HOOPER, who is a 55-yr-old white female, with assuming the identity of an African-American male child, for the purpose of using of obtaining a Social Security number to be used in the fraudulent purchase of a home.

Members of the public are reminded that the indictments contains only charges. A defendant is presumed innocent of the charges and it will be the government's burden to prove a defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at trial.

The case is being investigated by Special Agents of the HUD-OIG, and FBI, with assistance from US Postal Inspectors, the DeKalb County District Attorney's Office, and the Florida A&M University Police Department. The United States Attorney's Office also wishes to thank residents and neighborhood associations in DeKalb County for their assistance in this case.

Assistant United States Attorney Gale McKenzie is prosecuting the case.
For further information please contact William S. Duffey, Jr., United States Attorney or F. Gentry Shelnutt, Chief, Criminal Division, through Patrick Crosby, Public Affairs Officer, U.S. Attorney's Office, at (404) 581-6016. The Internet address for the HomePage for the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Georgia is www.usdoj.gov/usao/gan.


WXIA-TV ATLANTA
DESKTOP iBAR | NEWSLETTERS | EVENTS | HOME & GARDEN | CHILD CARE | RECIPES JOBS
| CARS
Brenda and Wes News 11Alive Home
HOME
NEWS
WEATHER
SPORTS
MONEY
LIFE
TECH
ON WXIA
TOOLS
SEARCH

Woman Arrested in Mortgage Fraud
Print E-mail This E-mail Make Us Home


Video

Judith Hooper



Local News Headlines
Lawmakers Deadlock on State Budget
Marietta Soldier Is Remembered
Firefighter Injured at House Fire
Driver Ticketed for Anti-Bush Sticker
Driver Charged in Fatal Car Wreck
11Alive Politics Blog - Week 11
Prayers, Protests Target Perdue

Reported By: Kevin Rowson
Web Editor: Manav Tanneeru
Last Modified: 3/8/2005 12:07:27 PM

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police have arrested a 57-year old woman wanted in a mortgage fraud scheme in metro Atlanta.

Judith Hooper was indicted last May for her role in a scheme that defrauded banks and homeowners of more than $20 million. The scheme left people without homes and devalued property values in four subdivisions near Stone Mountain, Georgia.

Hooper was arrested in Maces Bay, New Brunswick where she had been living the past 3 or 4 years.

She was one of 13 people who were charged with a scheme involving the purchase of homes for resale at artificially inflated prices. In one instance, Hooper is charged with using the identity of a 2-year-old boy to buy a home.

Hooper has been on the run since she and 12 others were indicted in May 2004. The FBI says she has about three different identities and before she moved to Canada, she spent some time in Belize where she had some plastic surgery done on her face to change her appearance.

One person related with Hooper’s arrest is Ann Fulmer of the Georgia Real Estate Fraud Prevention and Awareness Coalition (GREFPAC). “I am delighted. She caused an awful lot of damage and hurt a lot of people and caused some banks a lot of money and I am very happy that she's been arrested,” Fulmer said.

Residents in waters edge, a subdivision of $300,000 homes, were credited with bringing the scam to the government’s attention. They are slowly recovering from the scheme.

“They were having an awful lot of problems with vacant houses and with a really high level of foreclosure which has a tendency to depress market values for houses that are legitimately on the market,” Fulmer said.

Hooper is scheduled to appear before a U.S. Magistrate Court in Bangor, Maine Tuesday morning.